Search

Begin New Search Topic International Law Publication Year within 10 Years

161. SOUTH AMERICA FACING BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATIES: TOWARDS A RETURN OF THE STATE IN DISPUTE SETTLEMENT?

Author:
Magdalena Bas Vilizzio
Publication Date:
12-2015
Content Type:
Working Paper
Institution:
The New School Graduate Program in International Affairs
Abstract:
In their external relations, States require a regulatory framework intended to preserve their sovereignty, the legal attribute of which independent States are granted and recognized each other and to the exclusion of any other organization. Therefore, it emerges the necessity of a coordination juridical system as International Public Law. However, the regulation of certain subjects has generated changes putting into question some traditional postulates related to the system. That is the case of investor – State dispute settlement, mainly based on bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and on the Convention on the settlement of investment disputes between States and nationals of other States, signed in Washington in 1965 (CW) that creates the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)….
Topic:
Diplomacy, International Law, Regional Cooperation, and Sovereignty
Political Geography:
South America and Latin America

162. A Scrap of Paper: Breaking and Making International Law during the Great War, Isabel V. Hull

Author:
Tanisha M. Fazal
Publication Date:
01-2015
Content Type:
Journal Article
Journal:
Political Science Quarterly
Institution:
Academy of Political Science
Abstract:
Isabel Hull's analysis of international law during World War I is a welcome and valuable contribution to an emerging body of scholarship on the laws of war. This is not to undercut its place in the historiography of World War I. Hull rightly points out that most histories of the war have tended to gloss over or even dismiss the role of international law in the war. Hull corrects this bias by delving into British, French, and particularly German archives to show that international law was very much on the minds of all parties to the conflict. Indeed, she argues that preserving the existing structure of international law was a major reason for the outbreak of war. - See more at: http://www.psqonline.org/article.cfm?IDArticle=19345#sthash.HizIRkHF.dpuf
Topic:
International Law and War
Political Geography:
France and Germany

163. Over-stating Palestine's UN Membership Bid?An Ethnographic Study on the Narratives of Statehood

Author:
Michelle Leanne Burgis-Kasthala
Publication Date:
02-2015
Content Type:
Journal Article
Abstract:
This study employs a select ethnography of Palestinian workers in the field of international law and human rights to explore how an epistemic community gives content and meaning to international law in its professional and personal life. Through a series of interviews conducted in the West Bank in the wake of the Palestinian attempt to gain full United Nations membership in September 2011, the article constructs a meta-narrative about the nature of international legal discourse as spoken on the Palestinian periphery. It shows how speakers of international law are required to restate or over-state the distinction between law and politics so as to sustain their hope and desire for Palestinian statehood in the face of despair about its protracted denial. The article then is an exploration about the politics of meaning making through international law and a call for methodological hybridity within the discipline of international law.
Topic:
Human Rights, International Law, Politics, and United Nations

164. Complexity Theory and the Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of State Responsibility

Author:
Mark Chinen
Publication Date:
02-2015
Content Type:
Journal Article
Abstract:
This article argues that a gap that has always existed in the law of state responsibility is now becoming more apparent. That gap divides a state from its citizens, making it difficult to justify why state responsibility should be distributed to them. Purely legal approaches to the issue are not likely to resolve the problem, and although the literature of moral collective responsibility suggests some bases for having citizens share the costs of state responsibility, none are completely satisfying. Concepts from complexity theory show why this is so. If the theory is correct, the state is neither a legal abstraction nor reducible to the individuals who purportedly comprise it. Instead, it is an emergent phenomenon that arises from complex interactions among individuals, formal and informal subgroups, and the conceptual tools and structures that individuals and subgroups use to comprehend and respond to their physical and social environments. The theory is consistent with a basic premise of international law that the state as such is an appropriate bearer of responsibility. However, because in a complex system there is no linear connection between the emergent phenomenon and its underlying constituents, this suggests that the divide between a state and its citizens in the distribution of state responsibility may never be bridged.
Topic:
International Law

165. When Structures Become Shackles: Stagnation and Dynamics in International Lawmaking

Author:
Jan Wouters, Joost Pauwelyn, and Ramses A. Wessel
Publication Date:
02-2015
Content Type:
Journal Article
Abstract:
Formal international law is stagnating in terms both of quantity and quality. It is increasingly superseded by 'informal international lawmaking' involving new actors, new processes, and new outputs, in fields ranging from finance and health to internet regulation and the environment. On many occasions, the traditional structures of formal lawmaking have become shackles. Drawing on a two-year research project involving over 40 scholars and 30 case studies, this article offers evidence in support of the stagnation hypothesis, evaluates the likely reasons for it in relation to a 'turn to informality', and weighs possible options in response. But informal structures can also become shackles and limit freedom. From practice, we deduce procedural meta-norms against which informal cooperation is increasingly checked ('thick stakeholder consensus'). Intriguingly, this benchmark may be normatively superior (rather than inferior) to the validation requirements of traditional international law ('thin state consent').
Topic:
Environment, Health, and International Law

166. The Politics of Interest in International Law

Author:
Mónica García-Salmones Rovira
Publication Date:
02-2015
Content Type:
Journal Article
Abstract:
The article examines the substance and form of 20th century positivist international law; in particular the way in which each determines the other. The text describes the turn to interests in international law, which evolved slowly in scope and depth. By examining Lassa Oppenheim's focus on 'common interests' that united states and Hans Kelsen's focus on the 'struggle of interests' that constituted politics, the article studies two phenomena produced by the foundational role taken by interests during the 20th century. First, this role contributed to putting an end to the moral discussion about the treatment of native populations. Secondly, it curbed debate about a common political project for a global order, thus creating conformity characterized by abuse of power – all in the name of the neutrality of positivist law. This article suggests that the work of these two leading theoreticians in the field has contributed to the shaping of the legal theory of mainstream positivist international law, and seeks to foreground discussions about the different theories on the role of law in politics. In this manner it aims to help reconceptualize law in such a way as to bring about a situation in which discussions of a common political project for the international arena are more central.
Topic:
International Law and Politics
Political Geography:
United States

167. The Politics of Interest in International Law: A Reply to Mónica García-Salmones Rovira

Author:
Jörg Kammerhofer
Publication Date:
02-2015
Content Type:
Journal Article
Abstract:
In this response to Mónica García-Salmones Rovira's article 'The Politics of Interest in International Law', the argument is developed that an interpretation of Kelsen's legal theory as founded on 'interests' or 'conflicts of interests' is not adequately supported by the primary materials, if read in their context. 'Interests' do not play a major role in Kelsen's writings, and where they are discussed, they do not form part of his legal theory, i.e., the Pure Theory of Law. This response argues that this 'context insensibility' in reading Kelsen may have its roots in the unwitting adoption of one over-arching method of scholarly cognition. It thereby implicitly discards one of the crucial axioms of Kelsen's theory of scholarship: the avoidance of a syncretism of methods through a consistent separation of scholarly enterprises and methods. Not to adopt such a separation is a legitimate stance; to foist the non-separation on an author whose theory hinges upon it is not.
Topic:
International Law

168. The Politics of Interest in International Law: A Rejoinder to Jörg Kammerhofer

Author:
Mónica García-Salmones Rovira
Publication Date:
02-2015
Content Type:
Journal Article
Abstract:
I am very grateful to Jörg Kammerhofer for his engagement with my text. Not only does he know Kelsen's main writings on legal theory very well, but he is himself a Kelsenian scholar. One is led, therefore, to speculate on the extent to which his reply comes close to what Kelsen himself would have written in respect of my article, and more generally in respect of the book on which it is based.
Topic:
International Law

169. F.F. Martens and His Time: When Russia Was an Integral Part of the European Tradition of International Law

Author:
Lauri Mälksoo
Publication Date:
02-2015
Content Type:
Journal Article
Abstract:
This introductory article opens the symposium which examines the legacy of the Russian international lawyer Friedrich Fromhold von (or Fyodor Fyodorovich) Martens (1845–1909). In the first section, the article critically reviews previous research and literature on Martens and discusses the importance of the Martens diaries that are preserved in a Moscow archive. In the second section, the article offers an intellectual portrait of Martens and analyses the main elements in his international legal theory as expressed in his textbook. In particular, his claim that international law was applicable only between 'civilized states' is illuminated and discussed.
Topic:
International Law
Political Geography:
Russia and Europe

170. F.F. Martens – Man of the Enlightenment: Drawing Parallels between Martens' Times and Today's Problems

Author:
Rein Müllerson
Publication Date:
02-2015
Content Type:
Journal Article
Abstract:
This article concentrates on two controversial aspects of the writings of Friedrich Fromhold Martens – his treatment of the so-called mission civilisatrice of European nations and the potential clash of the two roles an international lawyer may have to perform: in the service of international law and representing national interests of his/her country or other clients. Both of these aspects in Martens' work have not lost their topicality; it is illuminating to draw parallels between his time and today's world.
Topic:
International Law
Political Geography:
Europe