Search

Begin New Search Journal The Goettingen Journal of International Law Publishing Institution The Goettingen Journal of International Law

91. Limits of the Impact of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia on the Domestic Legal System of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Author:
Eszter Kirs
Publication Date:
06-2011
Content Type:
Journal Article
Journal:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Institution:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Abstract:
Information is a fundamental resource in post-conflict societies. However, information-sharing may lead to both advantages and disadvantages. The main focus of the present paper is the flow of information and knowledge from the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) to the domestic judicial system of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Following a brief introduction of the dynamics of the changing relationship of the Tribunal and the Bosnian judiciary, the paper aims to outline the positive achievements and the practical barriers of the international intervention into the management of war crime cases in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The paper introduces the practical problems that came forth with the introduction of the adversarial procedure in the domestic judicial system, by which measure international intervention might have gone too far resulting also in negative consequences with regard to the management of domestic war crime trials.
Political Geography:
Bosnia, Herzegovina, and Yugoslavia

92. The Abyei Arbitration: A Model Procedure for Intra-State Dispute Settlement in Resource-Rich Conflict Areas?

Author:
Freya Baetens and Rumiana Yotova
Publication Date:
06-2011
Content Type:
Journal Article
Journal:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Institution:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Abstract:
In 2009, the Permanent Court of Arbitration administered a unique case: the Abyei Arbitration between the Government of Sudan and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army. This case is unique in several aspects: first, it is an example of intra-state dispute settlement in a conflict zone rich in natural resources, second, it was conducted under a fast-track procedure, and third, it was fully transparent, with all documents and full webcast of the proceedings still available on the PCA website. Currently there is a large number of outstanding intra-state disputes, not limited to Africa, so this paper assesses why the Parties in the Abyei Arbitration chose arbitration in the first place and whether this model could be successfully applied to other similar disputes.
Topic:
Government
Political Geography:
Africa and Sudan

93. Adjudicating Conflicts Over Resources: The ICJ's Treatment of Technical Evidence in the Pulp Mills Case

Author:
Juan Guillermo Sandoval Coustasse and Emily Sweeney-Samuelson
Publication Date:
06-2011
Content Type:
Journal Article
Journal:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Institution:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Abstract:
Conflicts over resources and the consequences of utilizing those resources can ignite social and political demonstrations, especially when the conflict is over a shared resource. Solving those conflicts requires both an institution and a procedure that are not just binding but also legitimate in the eyes of the constituencies An important aspect of a legitimate procedure is that it correctly establishes the facts.

94. From Riches to Rags – the Paradox of Plenty and its Linkage to Violent Conflict

Author:
Pelin Ekmen
Publication Date:
06-2011
Content Type:
Journal Article
Journal:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Institution:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Abstract:
The article addresses the economic phenomenon of the so called Dutch Disease, also known as the Paradox of Plenty, as faced by countries rich in natural resources. Rendering a rough definition of this occurrence, the article continues to dwell on the link age between violent conflict and illicit resource trade in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
Political Geography:
Democratic Republic of the Congo

95. Resources of Conflict - Conflicts over Resources

Author:
Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger
Publication Date:
06-2011
Content Type:
Journal Article
Journal:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Institution:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Abstract:
I am honored, esteemed colleagues and scholars, to assist you in opening this conference. We are gathered here to consider a crucial and timely problem, the linkages between two impossible challenges facing over a billion people in our world today. Conflicts over resources have been responsible for disputes and even wars both among, and within, many countries. They cause suffering for millions today, and continue to hold back important progress for many, many more. This conference doesn't just accept these terrible facts. It actively considers how the law can help to break the vicious cycle, bringing resolution and sustainable development to those who most need it. I congratulate the organizers, and also all of you as speakers and participants, for your foresight and your intellectual courage.

96. The Politics of Deformalization in International Law

Author:
Jean d'Aspremont
Publication Date:
09-2011
Content Type:
Journal Article
Journal:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Institution:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Abstract:
Confronted with the pluralization of the exercise of public authority at the international level and the retreat of international law as a regulatory instrument, international legal scholars have engaged in two survival strategies. On the one hand, there are international legal scholars who have tried to constitutionalize traditional international law with a view to enhancing its appeal and promoting its use by global actors. On the other hand, there are scholars who, considering any charm offensive to induce global actors to cast their norms under the aegis of classical international a lost battle, have embarked on a deformalization of international law that has led them to loosen the meshed fabric through which they make sense of reality. This deformalization of international law has sometimes materialized in a radical abandonment of theories of sources. The constitutionalist strategy has already been extensively discussed in the literature. The second approach has thrived almost unnoticed. It is this second scholarly strategy to the pluralization of the exercise of public authority that this article seeks to critically evaluate. After describing the most prominent manifestations of deformalization in the theory of international law and examining its agenda, the paper considers some of the hazards of deformalization. This paper simultaneously demonstrates that formalism has not entirely vanished, as it has continued to enjoy some support, albeit in different forms. These variations between deformalization and the persistence of formalism, this paper concludes, are the result of political choices which international legal scholars are not always fully aware of.
Topic:
International Law

97. The Myth of 'International Crimes': Dialectics and International Criminal Law

Author:
Mayeul Hiéramente
Publication Date:
09-2011
Content Type:
Journal Article
Journal:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Institution:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Abstract:
The label of 'international crime' for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes appears to be universally or at least widely accepted and casting doubt regarding this determination is considered a near transgression for an international (criminal) lawyer. The way international (criminal) lawyers label a crime influences the way they present it, their readers perceive it and the academic community reproduces it. Ultimately, repeated references to the presupposed 'international nature' influence the evolution of international (customary) law, blur the line between the 'international' and the 'national' and create an amalgam of wishful thinking, political aspirations, prosecutorial necessities and the evolution of substantive (criminal) law. This article scrutinizes why the current doctrine singles out a certain category of criminalized human rights abuses as 'international' and questions if genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes should really be viewed as 'international crimes', while murder, theft or sexual abuse are largely being considered as 'national crimes' or 'ordinary crimes'. It concludes that there is no substantive reason for classifying these crimes as 'international': they are per se no threat to peace; they don't share a contextual element; war crimes and genocide are not per se determined by the scale of the abuses; implication of the state or state-like entities is typical for human rights abuses in general and not only the so-called 'international crimes'. However, common to all three crimes is the (perceived) need and wish for an international response to the commission of the crimes in question. If the state is implicated in the commission and the cover-up of some of atrocities, the 'international community' has reason to fear that accountability for and punishment of these crimes cannot be achieved on the national level. 'International prosecutions' of 'national crimes' can therefore be considered legal and legitimate under limited circumstances.
Topic:
Human Rights

98. Does International Criminal Law Still Require a 'Crime of Crimes'? A Comparative Review of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity

Author:
Alexander R. J. Murray
Publication Date:
09-2011
Content Type:
Journal Article
Journal:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Institution:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Abstract:
This article argues that the crime of genocide is now a redundant crime in international law given the advances that have been made in the case law and application of crimes against humanity. It does this by providing an historical analysis of the two crimes before going on to consider four separate crimes against humanity and corresponding acts of genocide. The primary argument leveled against genocide is the difficulties that stem from proving the intent in the mind of the perpetrator to destroy a particular group in contrast to the less demanding category of crimes against humanity. It argues for a pragmatic rather than philosophical approach to international justice for the benefit of the victims and the prevention of criminal acts in the future.
Topic:
Law

99. Subsequent Practice and Established Practice of International Organizations: Two Sides of the Same Coin?

Author:
Christopher Peters
Publication Date:
09-2011
Content Type:
Journal Article
Journal:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Institution:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Abstract:
The present Article considers and compares the subsequent practice of the parties according to Art. 31 (3) (b) VCLT and established practice amounting to rules of an international organization (Art. 5 VCLT). The significance of these concepts lies in their potential to contribute to the adaptation of constituent instruments of international organizations to changing factual and normative circumstances. Established practice can serve as a hinge between the general law of treaties and the law of international organizations. The paper argues that both concepts are not two sides of the same coin, but that they have to be distinguished. Whereas subsequent practice primarily serves in interpretation, established practice amounting to a rule of the organization is quasi-customary law specific to the respective organization. It can even influence the preconditions for and significance of subsequent practice in the application of constituent instruments. Thus, the requirements for the agreement of the parties in accordance with Art. 31 (3) (b) VCLT can be relaxed and tacit consent can be recognized more easily. In some cases even organ practice which is independent from (all) Member States can create subsequent practice. However, these informal mechanisms of change raise problems of legitimacy.
Topic:
International Organization

100. Normative Heterogeneity and International Responsibility: Another View on the World Trade Organization and its System of Countermeasures

Author:
Ranieri Lima Resende
Publication Date:
09-2011
Content Type:
Journal Article
Journal:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Institution:
The Goettingen Journal of International Law
Abstract:
As legal subjects, international organizations are seen as apt for both active and passive participation in the international judicial area and, in this regard, are regulated according to a specific responsibility regime, as established by the United Nations International Law Commission, in its latest reports on this matter. The challenge here lies on testing this regime as to its applicability in relation to the World Trade Organization, in view of the fact that this organization's conduct may potentially produce internationally illicit acts. After asserting the WTO's juridical nature, normative parameters to which the entity is submitted are established in the general international law based on the acknowledgement of its horizontal and vertical relations with the so-called WTO Law. From this point onwards, it is possible to assert that international illicitness in the World Trade Organization's practice becomes legally verifiable through an institutional performance capacity analysis of its organs and agents, with special focus on its countermeasures system.
Topic:
International Organization, United Nations, and World Trade Organization

Refine your search