Search

Begin New Search Topic Democratization Publication Year within 25 Years

901. Wer regiert wie? Für eine äquivalenzfunktionalistische Beobachtung von Governance in Räumen begrenzter Staatlichkeit

Author:
Anke Draude
Publication Date:
01-2007
Content Type:
Working Paper
Institution:
Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 700
Abstract:
Der Artikel problematisiert die Übertragbarkeit des westlichen Governance-Konzepts auf Räume außerhalb der OECD-Welt. Ziel ist es, einen Forschungsansatz zu entwickeln, der diesen Räumen angemessenen ist. Zu diesem Zweck werden zunächst eurozentrische Prämissen im Governance-Konzept sichtbar gemacht. Hier geht es um die zentrale Dichotomie zwischen staatlichen und gesellschaftlichen Akteuren. Die Allgegenwart dieser Unterscheidung wird anschließend mit Hilfe der (de-)konstruktivistischen Erkenntnistheorien Foucaults, Luhmanns und Derridas erklärt. Ausgehend von einem zwar unumgänglichen, aber in seinem Ausmaß variablen Eurozentrismus skizziert die Autorin schließlich eine äquivalenzfunktionalistische Governance-Forschung, die nach der Art und Weise einer Leistung, nach dem „Wie“ und dem „Wer“, fragt. So werden europäische Dichotomien in Bezug auf die Akteure und die Handlungsmodi von Governance vermieden.
Topic:
Democratization, Development, International Cooperation, and Political Economy
Political Geography:
Germany

902. Governance, Normativität und begrenzte Staatlichkeit

Author:
Bernd Ladwig, Tamara Jugov, and Cord Schmelzle
Publication Date:
02-2007
Content Type:
Working Paper
Institution:
Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 700
Abstract:
Das vorliegende Working Paper versteht unter Governance eine Perspektive auf Regieren: Governance dient der intentionalen Handlungskoordination unter einer Mehrzahl von Akteuren durch kollektiv bindende Entscheidungen. Der Mehrwert des Governance-Begriff s liegt in der Betonung der Kontingenz der Modi des Regierens und der beteiligten Akteure. Wir argumentieren, dass der Governance-Begriff schwach normativ ist. Der „dichte Begriff “ des Regierens meint stets eine regelgeleitete Verteilung von Gütern im Unterschied zu Übeln. Jedes Regieren, das diesen Namen verdient, garantiert ein Mindestmaß an Erwartungssicherheit hinsichtlich überlebenswichtiger und Sozialität überhaupt ermöglichender Sachverhalte für eine defi nierte Gesamtheit von Regelungsadressaten. Die Übertragbarkeit dieses Governance-Begriff s auf Räume zerfallen(d)er Staatlichkeit ist aus zwei Gründen fraglich. Zum einen fehlt hier eine Instanz, die die Inklusion aller Betroff enen in die Governance-Leistungen letztverantwortlich garantieren kann, zum anderen ist in fragmentierten Gesellschaften umstritten, wer überhaupt dem Kreis der Regelungsadressaten angehört. Hieraus erwachsen normative und handlungstheoretische Probleme.
Topic:
Democratization, Development, International Cooperation, and Political Economy
Political Geography:
Germany

903. Regieren in Räumen begrenzter Staatlichkeit: Zur Reisefähigkeit des Governance-Konzeptes

Author:
Thomas Risse
Publication Date:
04-2007
Content Type:
Working Paper
Institution:
Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 700
Abstract:
Ein zentrales theoretisches Problem des wissenschaftlichen Diskurses über Governance besteht darin, dass die sozialwissenschaftlichen Konzepte vor dem Hintergrund der Erfahrung des Regierens in modernen und hoch entwickelten demokratischen Nationalstaaten der OECD-Welt formuliert wurden. Hieraus ergeben sich konzeptionelle Probleme hinsichtlich ihrer Anwendbarkeit auf historische und gegenwärtige Räume begrenzter Staatlichkeit. Diese Räume befinden sich vornehmlich außerhalb der OECD-Welt und sind kulturell, religiös aber auch im Hinblick auf Akteurskonstellationen und Handlungsmodi anders strukturiert als der moderne Nationalstaat westlicher Prägung. Der Beitrag behandelt diese „Reisefähigkeit“ des Governance-Konzeptes in andere Weltregionen und kulturelle Kontexte. Inwieweit sind die westlich geprägten Begrifflichkeiten auf diese übertragbar, und welche Probleme stellen sich dabei? Was können wir umgekehrt für die sozialwissenschaftliche Governance-Diskussion aus den Erfahrungen mit dem Regieren in Räumen begrenzter Staatlichkeit lernen?
Topic:
Democratization, Development, International Cooperation, and Political Economy
Political Geography:
Germany

904. Sonderforschungsbereich 700 - Grundbegriffe

Publication Date:
10-2007
Content Type:
Working Paper
Institution:
Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 700
Abstract:
Governance in Räumen begrenzter Staatlichkeit ist ein vergleichsweise junges Forschungsfeld. Seine gemeinschaftliche Bearbeitung im interdisziplinären Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 700 setzt einerseits eine Bestimmung der Grenzen des Feldes und andererseits eine gemeinsame Sprache voraus. Eine Einigung auf Kernkonzepte und Grundbegriffe ist in diesem Sinne zentrale Bedingung einer erfolgreichen gemeinsamen Erforschung von Governance in Räumen begrenzter Staatlichkeit.
Topic:
Democratization, Development, International Organization, and Political Economy
Political Geography:
Germany

905. 2007 EU Progress Report on Turkey: A Step Forward?

Author:
Mesut Özcan
Publication Date:
12-2007
Content Type:
Policy Brief
Institution:
SETA Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research
Abstract:
The EU progress reports on candidate countries are important indicators of how EU institutions manage and monitor the accession process. The 2007 European Union progress report on Turkey's EU membership gives a comprehensive account of how EU evaluates the political developments in Turkey. While the report is overall positive and supportive of the reform agenda of the AK Party government, it contains legitimate criticisms as well as debatable assessments on the Cyprus issue. Despite the shortcomings, Turkey should continue its efforts to strengthen democratization and focus on public diplomacy in the EU member countries.
Topic:
Democratization and Diplomacy
Political Geography:
Europe, Turkey, and Middle East

906. Turkey's War on Terror

Author:
Bülent Aras
Publication Date:
11-2007
Content Type:
Policy Brief
Institution:
SETA Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research
Abstract:
In an age of war on terror, Turkey pursues its own war against the escalating PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party) terror. The dynamics that led to a parliamentary motion for a cross border operation into Northern Iraq will have implications for Turkey's relations with Washington, Baghdad and other capitals in the region. The Expanded Meeting of the Neighboring Countries of Iraq held in Istanbul on 2-3 November 2007 coincided with Turkey's intensive regional diplomacy. There are serious challenges to ending PKK terrorism and finding a lasting solution to the Kurdish problem. The Erdogan Government must fight terrorism in a way that will not jeopardize the process of democratization and political reforms in Turkey.
Topic:
Conflict Resolution, Conflict Prevention, Democratization, Terrorism, and War
Political Geography:
Iraq, Washington, Turkey, Middle East, and Baghdad

907. A Collapsing Façade – The Russian Duma Election in perspective

Author:
Sinikukka Saari
Publication Date:
12-2007
Content Type:
Policy Brief
Institution:
Finnish Institute of International Affairs
Abstract:
The Duma election and its results reinforce the prevailing undemocratic trends in Russia. The changes in electoral laws, the election campaign and its biased coverage in the Russian media, the Russian authorities' hostile attitude towards international election observation and the so-called Putin's Plan leave very little hope of democratic pluralism developing in Russia anytime soon. Russia's political system has been built gradually over the years. The system aims at controlling the competition for power and securing the political elite's interests. The system is characterised by non-transparent and manipulated political processes, misleading doublespeak on democratic norms, and the misuse of soft and hard administrative resources. Putin's overwhelming popularity does not compensate for the lack of democratic accountability. Likewise, his possible premiership would not strengthen parliamentarism in Russia because the decision is driven by instrumentalism towards political institutions. Instead, it would create a dangerous precedent for an ad hoc separation of power. Western actors should be more aware that the stability that Putin is often praised for bringing about is not build on solid ground, and they should change their policies accordingly. Promoting democracy – and thus longterm stability – in Russia is in western actors' interests.
Topic:
International Relations, Democratization, and Politics
Political Geography:
Russia, Europe, and Asia

908. The Democratic Legitimacy of Private Governance. An Analysis of the Ethical Trading Initiative

Author:
Susanne Schaller
Publication Date:
01-2007
Content Type:
Working Paper
Institution:
Institute for Development and Peace
Abstract:
Private actors increasingly influence global governance and generate transnational rules and regulations. By creating soft law, they adopt governance tasks that were traditionally in the responsibility of sovereign states. These modes of “private governance” are quite disputed. Some hope that by including private actors, democracy on a global level can be enhanced. Others fear that private governance circumvents democratically legitimated governments and that private regulation competes with national and international law. Thus, questions arise about the legitimisation of private actors and about the democratic legitimacy of private governance.
Topic:
International Relations, Democratization, Government, and Privatization

909. Was Liberty Really Bad for Russia? Part I

Author:
Leon Aron
Publication Date:
08-2007
Content Type:
Policy Brief
Institution:
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
Abstract:
It is very much in the Russian and, even more so, Soviet political tradition for rulers to deprecate their predecessors. As they climb up the power ladder, the would-be Kremlin occupants must profess complete loyalty to the current leader in order to succeed. Once in power, the country's new masters bolster their authority by dissociating themselves from previous leaders. Along with the weakness of the country's political institutions, which undermines the legitimacy of the transitions, such repudiations almost inevitably result in the personalization of power, as the new occupants mold the political, social, and economic systems to their liking. Hence, Russian and—again and especially—Soviet history have often looked like a succession of very distinct personal political regimes—indeed, sometimes different states under the same name.
Topic:
Civil Society, Cold War, Democratization, and Politics
Political Geography:
Russia, Europe, Asia, and Soviet Union

910. Was Liberty Really Bad for Russia?

Author:
Leon Aron
Publication Date:
09-2007
Content Type:
Policy Brief
Institution:
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
Abstract:
Part I of this Russian Outlook dealt with what might be called the errors of commission, or false attribution, in the "chaos-of-the-1990s" stereotype, which became a major theme of the Putin Kremlin's propaganda. The economic crisis of that era, mostly inherited from the decaying Soviet economy, was laid at the revolutionary regime's door. Yet the "chaos" legend also contains errors of omission, for, on closer inspection, there was a great deal in the 1990s besides the alleged "chaos."
Topic:
Civil Society, Democratization, Government, Politics, and Privatization
Political Geography:
Russia, Eastern Europe, Asia, and Soviet Union