Political Geography: Yemen / Topic: State Formation

Author:: Osamah Al-Rawhani
Publication Date:: 10-2019
Content Type:: Working Paper
Institution:: Arab Reform Initiative (ARI)
Abstract:: Local governance has been viewed by academics, analysts and some political leaders in Yemen as a panacea to redress the excessive control of the central government, bring the state closer to its citizens and provide those citizens with socio-economic and political stability. Federalism, as a form of local governance, was adopted at the end of the National Dialogue Conference in 2013-2014, although there were disagreements over the number of regions and the federal map. It was posited as a viable vehicle for power-sharing and decentralization in Yemen and is considered a likely outcome after the conflict. However, there are several prerequisites for the effective devolution of power that are not yet in place in Yemen, most prominently the existence of strong consolidated central institutions. In short: it is a mistake to view federalism as a means of achieving stability, rather than a future goal once stability has been achieved.
Topic:: Democracy, State Formation, Decentralization, and Federalism
Political Geography:: Middle East, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Sana'a

Author:: Kai M. Thaler
Publication Date:: 09-2016
Content Type:: Journal Article
Journal:: Centerpiece
Institution:: Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University
Abstract:: It is rare in recent years when a civil war has not grabbed global headlines—be it the ongoing civil wars and international interventions in Syria and Yemen, the fragile peace process to end Colombia’s half-century-long war, or the secession and collapse into violence of South Sudan, to name a few. This increase in media coverage reflects a growing number of civil wars around the world: since World War II, civil wars have surpassed interstate wars as the most prominent form of large-scale violent conflict. Most civil wars end in a government victory or negotiated settlement, but between one-fifth and one-third—depending on the definitions used—end in rebel victory with the capture of the central state or secession.1 Significant scholarly attention has focused on when, why, or how a rebel group takes power; we have little comparative evidence about the downstream effects of rebel victory. What state structures do victorious rebels abolish, modify, or create? How do they decide on policy priorities? What explains variation in the strength and scope of the states they build?
Topic:: Civil War, State Formation, Violence, and Armed Conflict
Political Geography:: Middle East, Yemen, and Syria

Refine your search