1 - 4 of 4
Number of results to display per page
Search Results
2. Assessing How Foreign State-Owned Enterprises' U.S. Based Operations Disrupt U.S. Jobs
- Author:
- Oxford Economics
- Publication Date:
- 06-2019
- Content Type:
- Commentary and Analysis
- Institution:
- Oxford Economics
- Abstract:
- The entrance of a Chinese state-owned enterprise (SOE) in the transit passenger railcar manufacturing sector disrupts the current private-sector competitive railcar manufacturing sector in the U.S. In this study, Oxford Economics measures the net effects, stemming from this disruption by quantifying the loss to U.S. jobs, income and GDP that result from anti-competitive SOE practices. Even when domestic protective measures, such as 'Buy America' are put in place loss due to the SOE offshoring key apsects of their supply chain quickly accumulates--especially given the size and duration of municipal transit railcar contracts. We estimate that for every $1 billion in new contracts awarded to a Chinese SOE, the U.S. loses between 3,250 and 5,100 jobs.
- Topic:
- Hegemony, Employment, State Actors, Manufacturing, Job Creation, Supply Chains, and Contracts
- Political Geography:
- China, Asia, North America, and United States of America
3. From Joining to Leaving: Domestic Law’s Role in the International Legal Validity of Treaty Withdrawal
- Author:
- Hannah Woolaver
- Publication Date:
- 01-2019
- Content Type:
- Journal Article
- Abstract:
- If a state withdraws from a treaty in a manner that violates its own domestic law, will this withdrawal take effect in international law? The decisions to join and withdraw from treaties are both aspects of the state’s treaty-making capacity. Logically, international law must therefore consider the relationship between domestic and international rules on states’ treaty consent both in relation to treaty entry and exit. However, while international law provides a role for domestic legal requirements in the international validity of a state’s consent when joining a treaty, it is silent on this question in relation to treaty withdrawal. Further, there has been little scholarly or judicial consideration of this question. This contribution addresses this gap. Given recent controversies concerning treaty withdrawal – including the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union, South Africa’s possible withdrawal from the International Criminal Court, and the threatened US denunciation of the Paris Agreement – and the principles underlying this body of law, it is proposed that the law of treaties should be interpreted so as to develop international legal recognition for domestic rules on treaty withdrawal equivalent to that when states join treaties, such that a manifest violation of domestic law may invalidate a state’s treaty withdrawal in international law.
- Topic:
- International Law, Treaties and Agreements, European Union, Courts, and State Actors
- Political Geography:
- United Kingdom, Europe, South Africa, and United States of America
4. Will We Derail US Freight Rolling Stock Production?
- Author:
- Oxford Economics
- Publication Date:
- 05-2017
- Content Type:
- Commentary and Analysis
- Institution:
- Oxford Economics
- Abstract:
- US freight railcar manufacturers contribute $6.5 billion to U.S. GDP and support nearly 65,000 jobs. However, increased global competition and evidence suggesting unfair business practices puts this contribution at risk. Oxford Economics conducted an original study that evaluates the practices of Chinese state-owned enterprises' (SOE) push into the U.S. market and the potential risks to domestic manufacturers and domestic supply chains. The study focuses primarily on U.S. freight railcar production and includes consequences from a similar experience in Australia's freight railcar production, when faced with the entrance of Chinese SOEs.
- Topic:
- Economics, Hegemony, State Actors, and Transportation
- Political Geography:
- China, Asia, Australia, Australia/Pacific, North America, and United States of America