6471. Why the United States Should Not Attack Iraq
- Author:
- Ivan Eland and Bernard Gourley
- Publication Date:
- 12-2002
- Content Type:
- Working Paper
- Institution:
- The Cato Institute
- Abstract:
- For months the Bush administration has been preparing the country for war with Iraq. The administration has argued that only a forcible regime change can neutralize the threat that Saddam Hussein is said to pose. But the assumptions that underlie the administration's policy range from cautiously pessimistic to outright fallacious. First, there is a prevalent belief that if Iraq is able to obtain nuclear weapons it will inevitably use them. Second, there is a notion that Hussein is totally irrational and cannot be trusted to act in a predictable manner; and, because of that, his leadership creates a substantial risk of instability in the Middle East. Finally, many people in the United States have come to believe that war in Iraq may be the only means of nullifying the threat posed by Iraq's nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs.
- Topic:
- Security and Weapons of Mass Destruction
- Political Geography:
- United States, Iraq, Middle East, and Arabia