« Previous |
31 - 35 of 35
|
Next »
Number of results to display per page
Search Results
32. "From Extremism to Inclusion": Ariel Heifetz Knobel, Conflict Management Practitioner, Northern Ireland Specialist
- Author:
- Ariel Heifetz Knobel
- Publication Date:
- 11-2016
- Content Type:
- Video
- Institution:
- Israel/Palestine Creative Regional Initiatives (IPCRI)
- Abstract:
- The 4th IPCRI forum for 2016 focused on: "From Extremism to Inclusion" How hardliners joined the peace process in Northern Ireland
- Topic:
- Negotiation, Peace, Inclusion, Political Extremism, and Reintegration
- Political Geography:
- Israel and Palestine
33. On the Palestinian issue, how much credit should Europe get amongst Arab opinion for its economic and political support?
- Author:
- Ralitsa Trifonova
- Publication Date:
- 11-2010
- Content Type:
- Working Paper
- Institution:
- Center for Strategic Studies (CSS)
- Abstract:
- The formulation in the Council of Ministers’ of the European Union statement, issued on 8 December 2009, that within “an agreed time-frame” an independent Palestinian state should emerge on the Middle East’s political map raised hopes for a breakthrough in the remaining unsolved more than 60 years Palestinian issue. Together with the statement of the United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon in Moscow in the late 2009, this formulation is viewed by members of the Palestinian National Authority itself as a sign, in being specific in contrast with previous statements excluding a set timeframe for the establishment of a viable independent Palestinian state. After the unveiled Israeli violations of the international law during the last war over Gaza, a lot of voices not only in Palestine, but from all over world are revealing the impatience, reaching its nadir as Israeli behaviour does not represent threat only to the Palestinian people, but to the whole international system, especially when it shelled the headquarters of one the United Nations agencies on 15 January 2009. Some analysts believe that after the continued over 60 year’s failure of the USA to reach any significant progress to the benefit of the Palestinian people, it is high time Europe entered the Middle East arena as the third party, which would lead the two parties of the IsraeliPalestinian issue to a balanced solution, which does not reply on forced compromise. As the distrust of the Palestinian people with the USA is growing, Europe would only play a positive role if it were a trust-worthy ally itself. In order to give this alternative a positive perspective, we need to go back to the beginning of the European involvement in the Palestinian issue, to follow its own history of internal development, to explore the character of its economic aid and the existence of political support to the Palestinian people in their most turbulent and crucial moments in last four decades.
- Topic:
- Diplomacy, Human Rights, Territorial Disputes, Conflict, and Negotiation
- Political Geography:
- Europe, Israel, Palestine, and United States of America
34. The Annapolis Meeting: Too Little Too Late!
- Author:
- Hassan Barari
- Publication Date:
- 11-2007
- Content Type:
- Working Paper
- Institution:
- Center for Strategic Studies (CSS)
- Abstract:
- As of writing this piece, no final date has yet been set for the Annapolis meeting, but most likely it will be the last week of November. Amid the premature optimism, the concerned parties need to realize that the meeting is likely to fail. Indeed, rejectionists on both sides are already rubbing their hands gleefully in anticipation of a colossal failure. Therefore, many observers have warned that this summit requires careful planning and, more importantly, a day-to-day strategy, should the meeting fail. They argue that US Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice has backtracked from her original plans and has changed the agenda of the conference in such a way that it will have a limited purpose. The new thinking is that the Annapolis meeting should be seen as a process and not as an event. This article sheds light on the dynamics that will determine the degree of success.
- Topic:
- Diplomacy, Conflict, Negotiation, and Peace
- Political Geography:
- Middle East, Israel, Palestine, and United States of America
35. What Went Wrong? The Collapse of the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process
- Author:
- Jerome Slater
- Publication Date:
- 07-2001
- Content Type:
- Journal Article
- Journal:
- Political Science Quarterly
- Institution:
- Academy of Political Science
- Abstract:
- JEROME SLATER examines the collapse of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process in 2000 and argues provocatively that contrary to the prevailing view, it is Israel rather than the Palestinians that bears the primary responsibility, not only for the latest breakdown but for the entire course of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict since 1948.
- Topic:
- Territorial Disputes, Negotiation, and Peace
- Political Geography:
- Middle East, Israel, and Palestine
- « Previous
- Next »
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4