Author: Daniel Markey / Political Geography: Pakistan

Author:: Daniel Markey
Publication Date:: 05-2011
Content Type:: Policy Brief
Institution:: Council on Foreign Relations
Abstract:: U.S.-Pakistani relations are in crisis. For Washington, Osam a bin Laden's safe haven in Abbottabad raises questions about Pakistan's complicity and/or incompetence. For Islamabad, bin Laden's killing shows its vulnerability to U.S. operations on its own soil .
Topic:: Foreign Policy, Terrorism, War, Armed Struggle, Insurgency, and Bilateral Relations
Political Geography:: Pakistan, United States, and Washington

Author:: Daniel Markey
Publication Date:: 01-2010
Content Type:: Working Paper
Institution:: Council on Foreign Relations
Abstract:: India faces the real prospect of another major terrorist attack by Pakistan-based terrorist organizations in the near future. Unlike the aftermath of the November 2008 attack on Mumbai, in which 166 people died, Indian military restraint cannot be taken for granted if terrorists strike again. An Indian retaliatory strike against terrorist targets on Pakistani soil would raise Indo-Pakistani tensions and could even set off a spiral of violent escalation between the nuclear-armed rivals. Given Washington's effort to intensify pressure on al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated militants operating from Pakistani territory, increased tensions between India and Pakistan would harm U.S. interests even if New Delhi and Islamabad stop well short of the nuclear threshold because it would distract Pakistan from counterterror and counterinsurgency operations, jeopardize the U.S. mission in Afghanistan, and place new, extreme stresses on Islamabad.
Topic:: Conflict Resolution, Islam, and Terrorism
Political Geography:: Pakistan, Afghanistan, United States, South Asia, Washington, India, New Delhi, and Mumbai

Author:: Daniel Markey
Publication Date:: 04-2009
Content Type:: Policy Brief
Institution:: Council on Foreign Relations
Abstract:: President Barack Obama publicly unveiled his administration's so-called AfPak (Afghanistan-Pakistan) strategy on March 27, 2009. Over the subsequent weeks, the White House has also briefed relevant congressional leaders and committees, the media, NATO allies, and other regional and international partners. The U.S. House of Representatives has moved ahead with its own legislative debate (the PEACE bill), and the administration recently submitted a 2009 supplemental budget request consistent with its new strategy.
Topic:: Foreign Policy, Diplomacy, Terrorism, War, and Counterinsurgency
Political Geography:: Pakistan, Afghanistan, United States, and Asia

Author:: Daniel Markey
Publication Date:: 07-2008
Content Type:: Working Paper
Institution:: Council on Foreign Relations
Abstract:: Today, few places on earth are as important to U.S. national security as the tribal belt along Pakistan's border with Afghanistan. The region serves as a safe haven for a core group of nationally and internationally networked terrorists, a training and recruiting ground for Afghan Taliban, and, increasingly, a hotbed of indigenous militancy that threatens the stability of Pakistan's own state and society. Should another 9/11-type attack take place in the United States, it will likely have its origins in this region. As long as Pakistan's tribal areas are in turmoil, the mission of building a new, democratic, and stable Afghanistan cannot succeed.
Topic:: Terrorism and War
Political Geography:: Pakistan, Afghanistan, United States, Asia, and Taliban

Author:: Daniel Markey
Publication Date:: 12-2007
Content Type:: Policy Brief
Institution:: Council on Foreign Relations
Abstract:: How should the United States respond to Pakistan's ongoing political crisis? In particular, what position should the Bush administration take with regard to Pakistan's national elections?
Topic:: Conflict Resolution, Democratization, and Development
Political Geography:: Pakistan, United States, and Asia

Refine your search